There are only two choices for our government
and they are mutually exclusive.
“The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history,
whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite.”
Thomas Jefferson
This summarizes the problem that I am trying to address.
The American System: Government of, by and for the people designed
to protect human rights. Moral code: Truth and Justice Goal: Freedom with responsibility Individual Liberty Sovereign Nation States Representative Government Modus Operandi: Cooperation - Negotiations Tolerance & Understanding Transparency Viewpoint: Materialistic Likely outcome: Police State, Perpetual War, Fear Poverty, Depression & Loneliness |
The System of Imperial Empire: Government of Rulers and Subjects (read: slaves) designed for maximum benefit to the rulers.
Moral code: Might makes one right Only the strong survive All is fair in love and war To the victor belong the spoils Goal: Global Conquest Global Government: total central control Modus Operandi: Competition - Conquest Deception - Secrecy Divide and Conquer Viewpoint: Holistic Likely outcome: Prosperity, Enduring Peace & Joy |
America, where are we headed? We have a choice to make!
If we look at the list above, the choice might seem to be simple. The fact is however, that we have been living in the materialistic model of empire for a long time and all have a vested interest in seeing it continue. The biggest factor here is our connection to the money system. Our jobs, our savings, our retirement plans and welfare systems are all based upon it. Unfortunately, even this money system is based on fraud and is hopelessly bankrupt. We are beginning to realize that it cannot last but we cannot get ourselves to let go of it either. It is coming apart but there is still time to direct it into one of the above two types of government. The choice is actually simple. Probably 95% of people have advantage in seeing the American System prevail. Seriously, only very few people will benefit in a system of perpetual war. Read on to see how we can learn to cooperate and achieve this goal.
The choice as to the type of government that we will have runs a broad spectrum of possibilities; ranging from anarchy to total central control. Although, this is true, to a certain degree, in reality the choice is much simpler; we must choose between two mutually exclusive systems. Our current dilemma results from the fact that we can no longer see this clear and simple distinction. We “The People” have been fragmented into special interest groups, each with a separate point on the grand spectrum. We are so busy disagreeing with one another on minor points that we are no longer able to see which of the two basic sides we are actually on. These special interests cause so much division and animosity that we find it hard to engage in simple communication about issues. We have lost our ability to work together.
America began as a constitutional republic but our government has been hijacked. Our form of government has changed dramatically. It is quickly being restored as a colony of a global empire. It’s time to start paying attention and start directing the changes if we hope to salvage our founding ideals.
I’d like to illustrate my opinion on how we can restore sanity and stability to our society. Let me propose an explanation that allows everything to fall into place, making the world around us very logical. I believe that our leaders have an agenda that is different from what they are telling us. We live in a great country; America the beautiful, champion of truth, justice and liberty. We hold these values dear to our heart, in theory. However, in reality our national policies are drifting further and further from what we all believe. We are becoming part of the Empire and are instrumental in enslaving the world and ourselves in the process. Our youth have been co-opted into service as a mercenary army for the empire. Our taxes go to support the globalist agenda of empire. Our economy has been transformed from an industrial base to one based on financial speculation, gambling casinos, borrowing and consumption.
Our leaders do have an agenda to promote empire. They have willingly sided with our arch enemy and have consciously hijacked the U.S. government and are using it to dismantle America. We are about to lose everything we hold dear unless we wake up very soon.
GOVERNMENT RUNS A SPECTRUM:
People must have social interactions. We must decide on how to organize our society or a system will be imposed upon us by others. Another way to say this is that we must set up a system of government. There is a range of possible options between anarchy and total central control. Anarchy is the extreme where people have absolute personal freedom with no thought of other. Anarchy is extreme personal selfishness based on “every person for themselves” and will ultimately result in chaos because there are no rules. The other extreme is total central control or global government, which is ultimately a police state where most people are enslaved. This is represented above by systems like communism, national socialism, and empires like that of the British. One day I will improve my graphics. Now only the empire remains with a few stubborn holdouts.
The illustration above shows a few key points on this spectrum. At this point in history, people and nations of the world are intimately interrelated. The government we will have in the future can only fall on one point within this spectrum. Only if we consciously choose to defeat and –eliminate – the empire can we salvage some form of human dignity and any personal rights. We must understand this concept and come to an agreement about a shared value system; The American System. The war is not over and the American system of government is in jeopardy. Unfortunately the American people have been divided against themselves and therefore pose little threat of resistance.
It appears that we have many choices: but there is really only one!
Think of the above illustration with a pendulum which can move anywhere along this spectrum. It cannot be in two places at once. We must come to a consensus of what we want government to be before we can work toward that common goal. The countries of the world have become so interconnected that there must be a global consensus. Although each country should have the right to self determination, there must be a common, agreed upon standard for international relations. There cannot be sovereign nation states (or personal rights like freedom) in a global empire; just as there cannot be total central control in a free world.
So we have two important issues confronting us here and now. First: do we value the American system enough to make it a reality, not only here at home but internationally. Secondly: can we come to a consensus as to what we want this American system to look like. We have the constitution as a guide but differing interpretations. Much of this difference revolves around the question of how strong the central government should be. We must make a choice. The pendulum cannot fall on two points in the above spectrum, therefore any two points are mutually exclusive. We must deal with this second question soon or there will be infighting and by default, those who favor central control will prevail.
Our founding fathers fixed a point within this spectrum of government by setting up a government with a constitution. It was based on the idea of sovereign people living in sovereign nation states. This system consists of checks and balances to keep those who run the government operating within some constraints. Without these checks and balances there can be no restraints from total central control and therefore no human rights. As government gets stronger then the checks and balances become weaker.
You can see from the diagram that even from the start that there was some disagreement about how strong the new United States federal government should be. Thomas Jefferson, the second president and first secretary of state felt that, “government that governed least – governs best”. Alexander Hamilton who was the third president and first secretary of the treasury favored a stronger federal government with a central banking system and the authority to tax the people. This dispute continues to this very day and is personified in the popularity of Ron Paul (Jeffersonian) and Lyndon LaRouche (Hamiltonian). Although, these people/ideas disagree passionately; they are both in strong support of a constitutional republic and against a totalitarian empire. They are both on the side of America and should be natural allies. For some reason, there are strong and fundamental differences, even among supporters of an American system of government. I believe the reason for this is that when we started this new country, we tried to do it using the old rules of competition which is integral to empire. Our American system cannot work well unless we replace competition with cooperation. If we actually want a system of human rights to work successfully then we will have to learn tolerance and cooperation.
Government must be a consensus:
We can learn a lot from the election of 2008. There were a number of forces outside of the major parties that are attracting peoples attention.
Progressives - Green Environmentalists = Frustrated Democrats
Conservative – Tea Party = Frustrated Republicans.
Jefferson - Ron Paul - Libertarians
Hamilton - Lyndon LaRouche - FDR democrat
Spiritually Conscious Types - (evolution) – A New Age
We can create a better world.
Holistic Medicine Types - prevention is better than treatment - and cheaper too.
The Peace Movement – seems to have disappeared!
However, there is really only one issue. Do you want America as the only champion of human rights in the world, to survive. I know that many of us in America have strayed from the path and we are far from what our founders intended. The thing is that if America does not pull itself together and recall our mission then no one else will either. We are the last hope for human rights so hopefully we will find a way to work together in spite of our differences.
THE PENDULUM OF GOVERNMENT:
There is a range of possibilities. We must define the goal and then set the rules. If we do have a government of, by and for the people then we need to understand what our choices are. If we study the options now then we can design the best possible government. I suspect that when all is said and done, that we will find that our founding fathers were on target with the constitution. It has withstood the test of time and we can now look back and polish out any minor flaws and weaknesses that have shown themselves.
If we can come to an agreement then there will be little tendency to want to sabotage or undermine the plan. Agree first and then enjoy natural cooperation. The option is to compete and force your view on others. This will result in inevitable perennial conflicts and disagreements. We need to talk about all of the options available and then come to an agreement.
People must have social interactions. We must decide on how to organize our society or a system will be imposed upon us by others. Another way to say this is that we must set up a system of government. There is a range of possible options between anarchy and total central control. Anarchy is the extreme where people have absolute personal freedom with no thought of other. Anarchy is extreme personal selfishness based on “every person for themselves” and will ultimately result in chaos because there are no rules. The other extreme is total central control or global government, which is ultimately a police state where most people are enslaved. This is represented above by systems like communism, national socialism, and empires like that of the British. One day I will improve my graphics. Now only the empire remains with a few stubborn holdouts.
The illustration above shows a few key points on this spectrum. At this point in history, people and nations of the world are intimately interrelated. The government we will have in the future can only fall on one point within this spectrum. Only if we consciously choose to defeat and –eliminate – the empire can we salvage some form of human dignity and any personal rights. We must understand this concept and come to an agreement about a shared value system; The American System. The war is not over and the American system of government is in jeopardy. Unfortunately the American people have been divided against themselves and therefore pose little threat of resistance.
It appears that we have many choices: but there is really only one!
Think of the above illustration with a pendulum which can move anywhere along this spectrum. It cannot be in two places at once. We must come to a consensus of what we want government to be before we can work toward that common goal. The countries of the world have become so interconnected that there must be a global consensus. Although each country should have the right to self determination, there must be a common, agreed upon standard for international relations. There cannot be sovereign nation states (or personal rights like freedom) in a global empire; just as there cannot be total central control in a free world.
So we have two important issues confronting us here and now. First: do we value the American system enough to make it a reality, not only here at home but internationally. Secondly: can we come to a consensus as to what we want this American system to look like. We have the constitution as a guide but differing interpretations. Much of this difference revolves around the question of how strong the central government should be. We must make a choice. The pendulum cannot fall on two points in the above spectrum, therefore any two points are mutually exclusive. We must deal with this second question soon or there will be infighting and by default, those who favor central control will prevail.
Our founding fathers fixed a point within this spectrum of government by setting up a government with a constitution. It was based on the idea of sovereign people living in sovereign nation states. This system consists of checks and balances to keep those who run the government operating within some constraints. Without these checks and balances there can be no restraints from total central control and therefore no human rights. As government gets stronger then the checks and balances become weaker.
You can see from the diagram that even from the start that there was some disagreement about how strong the new United States federal government should be. Thomas Jefferson, the second president and first secretary of state felt that, “government that governed least – governs best”. Alexander Hamilton who was the third president and first secretary of the treasury favored a stronger federal government with a central banking system and the authority to tax the people. This dispute continues to this very day and is personified in the popularity of Ron Paul (Jeffersonian) and Lyndon LaRouche (Hamiltonian). Although, these people/ideas disagree passionately; they are both in strong support of a constitutional republic and against a totalitarian empire. They are both on the side of America and should be natural allies. For some reason, there are strong and fundamental differences, even among supporters of an American system of government. I believe the reason for this is that when we started this new country, we tried to do it using the old rules of competition which is integral to empire. Our American system cannot work well unless we replace competition with cooperation. If we actually want a system of human rights to work successfully then we will have to learn tolerance and cooperation.
Government must be a consensus:
We can learn a lot from the election of 2008. There were a number of forces outside of the major parties that are attracting peoples attention.
Progressives - Green Environmentalists = Frustrated Democrats
Conservative – Tea Party = Frustrated Republicans.
Jefferson - Ron Paul - Libertarians
Hamilton - Lyndon LaRouche - FDR democrat
Spiritually Conscious Types - (evolution) – A New Age
We can create a better world.
Holistic Medicine Types - prevention is better than treatment - and cheaper too.
The Peace Movement – seems to have disappeared!
However, there is really only one issue. Do you want America as the only champion of human rights in the world, to survive. I know that many of us in America have strayed from the path and we are far from what our founders intended. The thing is that if America does not pull itself together and recall our mission then no one else will either. We are the last hope for human rights so hopefully we will find a way to work together in spite of our differences.
THE PENDULUM OF GOVERNMENT:
There is a range of possibilities. We must define the goal and then set the rules. If we do have a government of, by and for the people then we need to understand what our choices are. If we study the options now then we can design the best possible government. I suspect that when all is said and done, that we will find that our founding fathers were on target with the constitution. It has withstood the test of time and we can now look back and polish out any minor flaws and weaknesses that have shown themselves.
If we can come to an agreement then there will be little tendency to want to sabotage or undermine the plan. Agree first and then enjoy natural cooperation. The option is to compete and force your view on others. This will result in inevitable perennial conflicts and disagreements. We need to talk about all of the options available and then come to an agreement.
For a government to be enduring , it must be formed out of a consensus.
We need to come to a consensus that some point along this spectrum will result in the best case scenario. Once we establish this point we must keep to this plan and set up a new social structure designed to keep a harmonious balance at this point. Our founding fathers set one point into law when they drafted the constitution. This has served us well but even here people have deviated in their interpretation of what was intended. Others have outright worked to undermine the constitution. Only by study of our history can we see these points of weakness and disagreement.
If we do not first resolve this issue then we may very well have anarchy in the end. It seems that we have made enough mistakes to see where we need to focus our attention.
If we do not first resolve this issue then we may very well have anarchy in the end. It seems that we have made enough mistakes to see where we need to focus our attention.
|
Let us reflect for a moment on what the American Revolution was about:
The choice before us is between being subjects of an Imperial Empire or being free people in a world of sovereign nation states? This choice has its basis in the American Revolutionary War. Let me make a critical point here. In relationships there are beginnings but no endings; so it is with wars. We can start wars but they never actually end. It would behoove us to be cautious when we start something new, especially wars. The bottom line is that the American Revolutionary War is not over; it is still in progress. The fact that many Americans believe that it is not only over but that America won. This gives our opponent many subtle advantages. The Empire has grown enormously and we don’t even acknowledge that it exists. Our leaders do not believe in America: Many of our leaders are proponents of global government with total central control. They are not being coerced, they willingly participate. We must understand that they operate from a different perspective. They believe that, “All is fair in love and war”. They are herding us into a global imperial empire. They do not believe in the American system nor in the U.S. constitutional republic. If we go where they are leading then we will forfeit our liberty and all other perceived human rights. We have a choice to make. Do we want to be free people in a system of nation states or can we tolerate being subjects of an imperial empire? These two systems function by completely different sets of rules. Our leaders must destroy America in order for the Empire to survive. America was founded on the principles of truth, justice and liberty. Lincoln may have said it best in the Gettysburg address when he said, “a government of, by and for the people”. We have drifted a long way from these principles. As a result, we have become weak and feeble. We are resuming our role as a colony of the empire, without even knowing it. We cannot assume that our enemy follows the same rules or believes in the same value system. The British Empire has morphed since we last thought about it. During the war (circa 1776) it consisted of red coats, tall sailing ships which ruled the seas and controlled many trade routes. It was still in competition with other empires around the world. At one time England claimed to have an empire “upon which the sun never set”. Although it had a global empire, it was not in total control of the world because there were competing empires. It did control segments of land around the globe but there was still work to be done. It had to defeat the other empires and assimilate the rest of the lands. Now, in 2010 it has consolidated its position. Now it is refined; a high technology, stealthy foe which permeates all of society. This is still a society consisting of a small elite group, using government for their own personal power and privilege. They are seeking to enslave the entire world as their subjects (read slaves). “ All is fair in love and war”. It might sound as if I am talking about achieving Utopia. The design of our American constitutional republic seems to be the prototype foundation for government based on a holistic model. If we seek harmony instead of competition and victory then we will find peace.  |
Dilemma: Empire is not only our enemy but it is also our parent. Another point illustrated on the above graph is the British Empire. This is the form of government which we rejected as a young nation. England is our mother land. This makes it especially hard to fight for what is right. We have been taught not to defy parental authority. In the case of America, a constitution and Bill of Rights has defined the social norm. People, who do not like the rules, simply claim to follow them as they work toward other goals. They simply lie! This is why it seems that politicians never keep their promises; they never intended to in the first place because they don’t believe in the system. In this process they have created a country that acts as an oppressive imperial empire when it claims to be a constitutional republic, which champions liberty and representative government. This schizophrenogenic environment has an adverse effect on the health and well being of every citizen. We have developed a system of government by deception. This may be acceptable operating procedure in an empire (where “All is fair in love and war”) but it is not acceptable in America (which is built on the ideal of truth and justice) which is the foundation of the trust that holds society together. Our leaders take an oath to defend and protect the constitution. When they do not, they are in violation of their contract. They are in criminal contempt of “The Law of the Land”. They have hijacked our very government and run it obeying the laws of empire and not the laws of the American system. They are criminals and should be treated as such. The Party System:
Two other points which I have localized on this spectrum of government are the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. This two party system is an abomination and has only served to weaken and destroy the idea of a constitutional republic. The constitution was designed to give power to individual people and to individual states. The party system totally undermines this process. Members and supporters of the two major parties are actively working to undermine our constitution. We cannot have representative government if political leaders owe more allegiance to their party than to the people they represent. The parties try to influence local elections and their enormous organizations frequently overpower the will of the local people. The national party organizations spend an enormous amount of money in local elections in order to influence (control) the outcomes. This process undermines the intent of the U.S. Constitution; which designed a system to assure maximum local influence. If you focus on a small area – like for example – whether the Democrats or the Republicans are better, you miss the larger picture. Let’s step back and look at the big picture. It has been said that when choosing between the Democrats and the Republicans; you are choosing the “lesser of two evils”. If you want freedom and human rights then the two party system sets up a false debate. Both parties favor an imperial empire and are therefore Anti-American. Both parties are working to undermine the constitution by endorsing a globalist agenda. Remember, the more powerful the government is the less rights people are left with. There is an expression that, “those who would give up freedom for security deserve neither”. They will likely end up with neither. The parties themselves violate all constitutional principles by blurring all jurisdictions – and thus preventing all the checks and balances placed into the constitution from working properly. |